MaTRix

​The Many faces of Trauma and Recovery around the world: Mapping experiences in Cultural Context 

For this large project please see this page​

​

​​

G-Stress

A global assessment of the ICD-11 stress-related disorders

​

​

Project group

See Core collaborators and Collaborators below.

​

This project brings together traumatic stress experts from around the world including members of ISTSS, ESTSS, and DeGPT. Four of the collaborators are also part of the other Global Collaboration projects who such as the development of the Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS), the e-pamphlets for adults who have experienced childhood trauma (Internet information on Childhood Abuse and Neglect ((iCAN)) the the CARTS project (ongoing). 

​

Core Collaborators

• Menachem Ben-Ezra, School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

• Jon Bisson, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

• Chris Brewin, Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

• Marylene Cloitre, National Center for PTSD Dissemination and Training Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.

•  Thanos Karatzias, Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh, UK.

• Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Department of Applied Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

• Andreas Maercker, Department of Psychology, Division of Psychopathology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

• Miranda Olff, Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and ARQ National Psychotrauma Center, Diemen, Netherlands.

• Neil Roberts, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK and School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

• Mark Shevlin, School of Psychology, Ulster University, Derry, Northern Ireland.

• Frédérique Vallières Trinity Centre for Global Health, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.

​

Collaborators

• Kristina Bondjers, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

•  Wai Tong Chien, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

•  Amy Chow, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

• Carmen Fernández-Fillol, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Spain.

• Andres Fresno, University of Talca, Chile.

• Marieke van Gelderen, Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group, Centrum ’45, Netherlands.

• Ohad Gilbar, Bar-Ilan University, Israel.

• Sachiko Inoue, Okayama Prefectural University, Japan.

• Evaldas Kazlauskas, Vilnius University, Lithuania.

• Matthias Knefel, University of Vienna, Austria.

• Grace W.K. Ho, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

• Eoin McElroy, University College London, UK.

• Grainne McGinty, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland.

• Carolina Salgado, University of Talca, Chile.

• Daja Somarasundaram, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

• Jiangping Wang, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

• Pei-Jung (Annie) Yang, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.

​

Background

Approximately 70% of the world’s population have been exposed to a traumatic life event (Benjet et al., 2016, Kessler et al., 2017), and the resulting mental health problems represent a major challenge to public mental health services, globally (Sara & Lappin, 2017). In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) released the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), the primary diagnostic manual used by health professionals worldwide (First, Reed, Hyman, & Saxena, 2015). All United Nations member states are committed to using the ICD-11, and relevant to psychotraumatologists, ICD-11 provides novel descriptions of stress-related psychopathology compared to the ICD-10 and the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

​

Under the parent category of ‘Disorders Specifically Associated with Stress’, ICD-11 defines a number of stress-related disorders including ‘Posttraumatic Stress Disorder’ (PTSD) (PB40), ‘Complex PTSD’ (CPTSD) (PB41), ‘Prolonged Grief Disorder’ (PB42), and ‘Adjustment Disorder’ (PB43). The guiding principles underlying the development on these disorders were that they should (a) maximize clinical utility by including a small number of core symptoms and (b) be internationally applicable (Maercker et al., 2013). The World Mental Health Survey consortium have provided information about the prevalence of traumatic life events, and PTSD, internationally (Benjet et al., 2016; Karam et al., 2014). While valuable, these studies utilized the now outdated DSM-IV description of PTSD.

Aims

As ICD-11 represents the primary diagnostic manual used worldwide, and includes a new and distinct model of stress-related psychopathology, it is imperative for psychotraumatology research and practice to determine the global prevalence rates of these disorders.

​

Methods and Output

Members of the G-Stress Project have begun to assess the current prevalence rates of the ICD-11 stress-related disorders using nationally representative samples in countries like Israel (Hyland et al., under review; Kilkelly et al., 2019), Germany (Maercker et al., 2018), United Kingdom (Maercker et al., 2018; Cloitre et al., 2018) and United States (Cloitre et al., in press). It is clear that substantially more data is needed from nations all around the world to better understand how common these disorders are. In this project, we invite members of the ISTSS’s Global Collaboration to contribute to the ongoing work that aims to ascertain the prevalence of the ICD-11 stress-related disorders around the world. By obtaining information about the prevalence rates of the ICD-11 stress-related disorder at a global level, the ISTSS’s Global Collaboration will be able to provide the scientific community with vital information about the frequency and distribution of stress- and trauma-related events, and stress-related disorders, globally. This would allow for more effective and efficient resource planning among global health professionals. 

​

​

LATrauma

Trauma in Latin America
 

Project leaders

Adrian Arevalo, Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de Piura, Perú 

Carolina Salgado, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile 
 

Project group
Adrian Arevalo, Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de Piura, Perú 

Carolina Salgado, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile 
Leslie Young Facultad de Medicina Humana Universidad de Piura, Perú
Mariela Osores, Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de Piura, Perú
Julia Carranza Facultad de Medicina Humana Universidad de Piura, Perú
Camila Espinoza, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Daniel Jiménez, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile
Susana Campos, Centro de Psicología Aplicada, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Talca, Chile y Núcleo Milenio para Mejorar la Salud Mental de Adolescentes y Jóvenes, IMHAY, Chile.
Bruno M. Coimbra, Department of Methodology & Statistics, Utrecht University, The Netherlands & Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Brazil

​

Background
Little is known about the state-of-the art about research related to traumatic events and their associated disorders in Latin America considering diagnosic criteria based on DSM-5 or ICD-11.

​

Aims

The initial aim is to identify bibliometric characteristics of studies carried out on trauma-related disorders associated perfomred in Latin America.

Method

A team has been formed with trauma clinicians/researchers from Peru, Chile and Brazil. A bibliometric analysis will be applied.

An AI supported systematic review using ASReview - as part of the GCTS methods section - is being prepared.

​